Albert Oehlen, Serpentine Gallery
I aproached Albert Oehlen's new exhibition with excitement as I am a
fan of Oehlen’s work, and his paintings have informed my own in various ways.
Dan Coombs and I have discussed the skill in which Oehlen avoids the centre of his
paintings, allowing all the separate elements to dance around it, and keep a
relatively quiet space at the core. The importance of this is related to
composition, Oehlen’s paintings exude the energy of chaos and abandon, but in
reality, they have a very carefully ordered structure that keeps all the
elements in motion and not trapped into a grid of horizontals and verticals.
The reason for not placing a weighty mark in the centre of a piece is because
if one did, that mark would completely dominate the whole piece, the viewer
would be immediately drawn to it and would zone in to the centre of the
bullseye, leaving the rest of the piece more or less unobserved. The trick in a
good painting is to keep the eye moving, a flowing movement that allows the
viewer to take in the entire piece. This is something I have observed in a few
other painters, namely Willem De Kooning and Cy Twombly and I have continued to
work on in my own paintings. This looseness of composition is key in removing
the awkwardness of a composition and I have discussed it in my notes on my own
practice under the heading of ‘breaking the grid’.
Oehlen’s
abstract paintings have the rhythm of a buoyant piece of music and dazzle us
with the variety of different painterly techniques. He mixes hard lines with
soft edges, brush marks with spray paint, and dark colours against light. He
uses a modern palette of colours that have only become possible to create with
modern chemicals. One device he uses is to have large elements of blurring in
amongst the other solid marks, which forms a kind of blind spot. I can see how
his work developed from its punk-painting beginnings, the rebelliousness and
risk-taking has carried over from his figurative work to his abstract, but now
the energetic grit is guided by a proper understanding of painting and formal
elements.
This new
collection of work at the Serpentine, however, does not impress me in the same
way his previous work has. The collection is pockmarked with a new motif: a
figurative and comical depiction of a moustached man. Perhaps it is simply a
taste thing, but the new motif seems to do nothing but throw the viewer off. It
isn’t a good drawing in any sense and gives the air of an artist who doesn’t
care very much about the piece. There is still some of the usual ingredients of
a good Oehlen painting surrounding the motif in a few of the rooms, although
the colour palette doesn’t have the electric taste it usually does. The paint
is quite muddy and dull in lots of the pieces, and the canvases look overworked
in a few cases.
Once the
viewer has circled the gallery and seen the large landscape format paintings in
the satellite rooms, we step into the central space of the Serpentine. With a
very high ceiling and natural light pouring in from above, the room is perfect
for large pieces, only the pieces don’t hold enough weight to grace the room.
They are huge charcoal drawings on paper, sparingly drawn with only a few
lines. Again, it’s the moustached man motif. Repeated over and over, with not
much in the way of interesting mark-making or texture, and no colour or depth
whatsoever. It feels like an artist with the privilege of money and space has
chucked together some work as an experiment of ‘what if’, which is perfectly
justified in its creation, but an experiment that should have never left the
studio. The show has glimpses of Oehlen’s strengths, but unfortunately it just
doesn’t appeal to me as a particularly interesting collection of work.
Comments
Post a Comment